Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.It ruled that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles ...
According to the syllabus prepared by the U.S. Supreme Court Reporter of Decisions, [80] in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), the Supreme Court held [80] [81] that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes ...
Robert A. Levy (born 1941) is chairman emeritus of the libertarian Cato Institute in Washington, DC. He was co-counsel in District of Columbia v. Heller, [1] the U.S. Supreme Court case establishing a Second Amendment individual right to gun ownership. Levy also organized and financed the Heller litigation. [2]
The case, in which the conservatives outvoted the liberals 5-4, followed in the path of a decision a two years ago in the case District of Columbia v. Heller that interpreted the Second Amendment ...
The Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 was passed by the District of Columbia city council on June 29, 1976, [1] [2] and went into effect September 24, 1976. [3] The law banned residents from owning handguns, automatic firearms, or high-capacity semi-automatic firearms, as well as prohibited possession of unregistered firearms.
United States (pertaining to the Gun Control Act of 1968) and McDonald v. Chicago. In District of Columbia v. Heller, he wrote a brief on behalf of the majority of both houses of Congress. He has written many books and articles on the topic of gun control, some of which have been cited in Supreme Court opinions (Heller, McDonald, Printz v.
Written Testimony of American Civil Liberties Union Dennis Parker, Director, Racial Justice Project on behalf of the Washington Legislative Office
Urbina dismissed Heller v. District of Columbia in 2010 and upheld the constitutionality of the statute. [18] The dismissal was appealed and overturned in a 2–1 vote. The case eventually made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in a 5–4 vote sided with Heller and declare the District's regulations unconstitutional. [citation needed]