enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Remand (court procedure) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remand_(court_procedure)

    Likewise, an appeals court may remand a case to a trial court. A remand may be a full remand, essentially ordering an entirely new trial; when an appellate court grants a full remand, the lower court's decision is "reversed and remanded." Alternatively, it may be "with instructions" specifying, for example, that the lower court must use a ...

  3. City of Norwood v. Horney - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Norwood_v._Horney

    City of Norwood v. Horney, 110 Ohio St.3d 353 (2006), was a case brought before the Ohio Supreme Court in 2006. The case came upon the heels of Kelo v.City of New London, in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that commercial development justified the use of eminent domain.

  4. Dolan v. City of Tigard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolan_v._City_of_Tigard

    Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), more commonly Dolan v.Tigard, is a United States Supreme Court case. [1] It is a landmark case regarding the practice of zoning and property rights, and has served to establish limits on the ability of cities and other government agencies to use zoning and land-use regulations to compel property owners to make unrelated public improvements as a ...

  5. Fracking is being forced onto some Ohio property owners ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/fracking-being-forced-onto-ohio...

    When Jill Antares Hunkler purchased land in Belmont County, Ohio, in 2007, she never envisioned her home would be surrounded by 78 oil and gas fracking wells a decade later, she said. "I wanted to ...

  6. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokeo,_Inc._v._Robins

    Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court vacated and remanded a ruling by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the basis that the Ninth Circuit had not properly determined whether the plaintiff has suffered an "injury-in-fact" when analyzing whether he had standing to bring his case in federal court. [1]

  7. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Village_of_Euclid_v...

    Ambler Realty owned 68 acres (0.28 km 2) of land in the village of Euclid, Ohio, a suburb of the industrial city of Cleveland.In an attempt to prevent Cleveland from subsuming the village and the growth of industry which might change its character, Euclid developed a zoning ordinance based upon six classes of use, three classes of height and four classes of area.

  8. Ohio voters soundly reject proposed amendment linked to ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/ohio-voters-soundly-reject-proposed...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  9. After court-ordered review, Yost approves Ohio Voters Bill of ...

    www.aol.com/court-ordered-review-yost-approves...

    (The Center Square) – An Ohio Voters Bill of Rights can move forward to get before voters as an amendment to the state’s constitution. Attorney General Dave Yost approved the summary for the ...