enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pragmatic validity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatic_validity

    In Validity & Social Experimentation, edited by L. Bickman. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Susman, G.I. and Evered. R.D., 1978. "An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research." Administrative Science Quarterly 23:528-603. van Aken, J. E. 2005. "Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge ...

  3. Designing Social Inquiry - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Designing_Social_Inquiry

    The goal of the book is guide researchers in producing valid causal inferences in social science research. [8] The book primarily applies lessons from regression-oriented analysis to qualitative research, arguing that the same logics of causal inference can be used in both types of research.

  4. Internal validity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_validity

    Internal validity, therefore, is more a matter of degree than of either-or, and that is exactly why research designs other than true experiments may also yield results with a high degree of internal validity. In order to allow for inferences with a high degree of internal validity, precautions may be taken during the design of the study.

  5. Scientific method - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

    The history of scientific method considers changes in the methodology of scientific inquiry, not the history of science itself. The development of rules for scientific reasoning has not been straightforward; scientific method has been the subject of intense and recurring debate throughout the history of science, and eminent natural philosophers and scientists have argued for the primacy of ...

  6. Bradford Hill criteria - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradford_Hill_criteria

    Since the description of the criteria, many methods to systematically evaluate the evidence supporting a causal relationship have been published, for example the five evidence-grading criteria of the World Cancer Research Fund (Convincing; Probable; Limited evidence – suggestive; Limited evidence – no conclusion; Substantial effect on risk ...

  7. Construct validity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construct_validity

    Correlations that fit the expected pattern contribute evidence of construct validity. Construct validity is a judgment based on the accumulation of correlations from numerous studies using the instrument being evaluated. [22] Most researchers attempt to test the construct validity before the main research. To do this pilot studies may be ...

  8. Logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic

    For example, modus ponens is a rule of inference according to which all arguments of the form "(1) p, (2) if p then q, (3) therefore q" are valid, independent of what the terms p and q stand for. [13] In this sense, formal logic can be defined as the science of valid inferences. An alternative definition sees logic as the study of logical ...

  9. Material inference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_inference

    In logic, inference is the process of deriving logical conclusions from premises known or assumed to be true. In checking a logical inference for formal and material validity, the meaning of only its logical vocabulary and of both its logical and extra-logical vocabulary [clarification needed] is considered, respectively.