enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. False equivalence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence

    A false equivalence or false equivalency is an informal fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency. [1] Colloquially, a false equivalence is often called "comparing apples and oranges."

  3. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    False authority (single authority) – using an expert of dubious credentials or using only one opinion to promote a product or idea. Related to the appeal to authority. False dilemma (false dichotomy, fallacy of bifurcation, black-or-white fallacy) – two alternative statements are given as the only possible options when, in reality, there ...

  4. It's Even Worse Than It Looks - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It's_Even_Worse_Than_It_Looks

    The book was published several months before the 2012 United States presidential election. Its publication, especially at a time of heightened public political interest, brought attention to the asymmetry between the parties' tactics for winning elections and the tendency for the media to succumb to false equivalence in political reporting.

  5. False necessity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_necessity

    The development of the theory is credited to philosopher and politician Roberto Mangabeira Unger.His main book on the thesis, False Necessity: Anti-necessitarian social theory in the service of radical democracy, was first published in 1987 by Cambridge University Press, and reissued in 2004 by Verso with a new 124 page introduction, and a new appendix, "Five theses on the relation of religion ...

  6. Fringe theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fringe_theory

    [4] This false equivalence can become the expected media behavior. When The New York Times published an article strongly supporting the mainstream scientific stance on thiomersal and vaccines, [40] others in the media condemned the Times for portraying the alleged vaccine-autism connection as a fringe theory, calling the article a "hit piece". [41]

  7. Motte-and-bailey fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy

    According to Shackel, David Bloor's strong programme for the sociology of scientific knowledge made use of a motte-and-bailey doctrine when trying to defend his conception of knowledge as "whatever people take to be knowledge", without distinguishing between beliefs that are widely accepted but contrary to reality, and beliefs that correspond ...

  8. Leonard Hobhouse - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Hobhouse

    Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse, FBA (8 September 1864 – 21 June 1929) was an English liberal political theorist and sociologist, who has been considered one of the leading and earliest proponents of social liberalism. [1] [2] [3] His works, culminating in his famous book Liberalism (1911), occupy a seminal position within the canon of New ...

  9. Fact-checking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact-checking

    Commentators have also shared concerns about the use of false equivalence as an argument in political fact-checking, citing examples from The Washington Post, The New York Times and The Associated Press where "mainstream fact-checkers appear to have attempted to manufacture false claims from progressive politicians...[out of] a desire to appear ...