Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal, 546 U.S. 418 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, the government had failed to show a compelling interest in prosecuting religious adherents for drinking a sacramental tea containing a Schedule I controlled substance. [1]
The case concerned the constitutionality of a 2018 Mississippi state law that banned most abortion operations after the first 15 weeks of pregnancy. Jackson Women's Health Organization —Mississippi's only abortion clinic at the time—had sued Thomas E. Dobbs , state health officer with the Mississippi State Department of Health , in March 2018.
Articles of association are critical documents to corporate operations, as they may regulate both internal and external affairs. [1] Articles of incorporation, also referred to as the certificate of incorporation or the corporate charter, is a document or charter that establishes the existence of a corporation in the United States and Canada.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
A few weeks after Dunn filed a formal complaint about the situation, the Florida AG responded with an email recommending that he contact state health agencies, the local sheriff or the company itself. A back and forth with Florida’s Agency For Health Care Administration, which Dunn then contacted, petered out.
After the boy's death, the Tyre Sampson Act passed unanimously in Florida. The act calls for increased amusement ride safety to protect park visitors. Family of Missouri teen who fell to death on ...
Florida's attorney general said on Thursday she filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency for allegedly discriminating against hurricane victims who supported President ...
evidence obtained during a search the police conducted as a result of an isolated act of negligence not related to the search is not subject to the exclusionary rule: Oregon v. Ice: 555 U.S. 160 (2009) the facts necessary for imposing consecutive prison terms need not be submitted to a jury in accordance with Apprendi v. New Jersey: Waddington ...