enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States obscenity law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_obscenity_law

    United States obscenity law deals with the regulation or suppression of what is considered obscenity and therefore not protected speech or expression under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In the United States, discussion of obscenity typically relates to defining what pornography is obscene. Issues of obscenity arise at ...

  3. Miller test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test

    The Miller test, also called the three-prong obscenity test, is the United States Supreme Court's test for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled obscene, in which case it is not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and can be prohibited. [1] [2]

  4. Obscenity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscenity

    These common-law ideas of obscenity formed the original basis of obscenity law in other common law countries, such as the United States. The classic definition of criminal obscenity is if it "tends to deprave and corrupt", stated in 1868 by Lord Justice Cockburn, in Regina v. Hicklin, now known as the Hicklin test.

  5. Hicklin test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hicklin_test

    United States, 161 U.S. 29 (1896), adopted the Hicklin test as the appropriate test of obscenity. [10] However, in 1933, the Hicklin test ended on the federal level when, in United States v. One Book Called Ulysses, 72 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1933), Judge John Woolsey found Ulysses to not be obscene. Avoiding the Hicklin test, he said instead that in ...

  6. Patently offensive - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patently_offensive

    Patently offensive is a term used in United States law regarding obscenity under the First Amendment.. The phrase "patently offensive" first appeared in Roth v.United States, referring to any obscene acts or materials that are considered to be openly, plainly, or clearly visible as offensive to the viewing public.

  7. A Constitutionally Dubious California Bill Would Ban ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/constitutionally-dubious...

    Georgia, the Court unanimously rejected a state law that made it a crime to possess "obscene matter." Writing for the Court, Justice Thurgood Marshall drew a distinction between that ban and other ...

  8. Roth v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth_v._United_States

    Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), along with its companion case Alberts v.California, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which redefined the constitutional test for determining what constitutes obscene material unprotected by the First Amendment. [1]

  9. SC law prohibits obscene and indecent bumper stickers ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/sc-law-prohibits-obscene...

    The Palmetto State doesn’t allow obscene bumper stickers on motor vehicles. Here’s how much a fine can cost. ... 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us. Sign in. Mail. 24/7 Help. For premium ...