enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Sherrill_v._Oneida...

    City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York, 544 U.S. 197 (2005), was a Supreme Court of the United States case in which the Court held that repurchase of traditional tribal lands 200 years later did not restore tribal sovereignty to that land. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion. [1]

  3. Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Indian_Nation_of...

    Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida, 414 U.S. 661 (1974), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court concerning aboriginal title in the United States. The original suit in this matter was the first modern-day Native American land claim litigated in the federal court system rather than before the Indian Claims ...

  4. County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/County_of_Oneida_v._Oneida...

    In City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York (2005), the Supreme Court held that laches barred the re-assertion of sovereignty over ancestral land re-acquired in fee simple; the Court did not consider whether the original aboriginal title over the disputed parcels was validly extinguished, and thus did not disturb its holding in ...

  5. Indian country jurisdiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_country_jurisdiction

    The Civil Rights Act of 1968 also amended Public Law 280 so that states no longer held civil and criminal jurisdiction over Indian country unless the tribes consented at certain elections. [20] Also, in relation to the extension of state law into Indian country, in the 1983 Supreme Court case, New Mexico v.

  6. Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayuga_Indian_Nation_of...

    Applying the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling in City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York (2005), a divided panel held that the equitable doctrine of laches bars all tribal land claims sounding in ejectment or trespass, for both tribal plaintiffs and the federal government as plaintiff-intervenor.

  7. Tee-Hit-Ton v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tee-Hit-Ton_v._United_States

    Tee-Hit-Ton v. United States, 348 U.S. 272 (1955), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a Tribal nation's right of occupancy (or "aboriginal title") may be eliminated by the United States without any compensation.

  8. Oneida Indian Nation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Indian_Nation

    The Oneida Indian Nation (OIN) or Oneida Nation (/ oʊ ˈ n aɪ d ə / oh-NY-də) [1] is a federally recognized tribe of Oneida people in the United States. The tribe is headquartered in Verona, New York, where the tribe originated and held territory prior to European colonialism, and continues to hold territory today.

  9. Solem v. Bartlett - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solem_v._Bartlett

    Solem v. Bartlett, 465 U.S. 463 (1984), was a United States Supreme Court case involving Indian country jurisdiction in the United States that decided that opening up reservation lands for settlement by non-Indians does not constitute the intent to diminish reservation boundaries.