Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[26] [22] [3] According to Cornell University constitutional law professor Michael C. Dorf, the amendment would protect the right to abortion in the state of New York by ensuring that prohibiting abortion would be an unconstitutional form of health-care discrimination because they would be "singling out one form of reproductive health care, and ...
The passage of Prop. 1 does not change current abortion law in the state, but it will protect against any future Republican attacks against the procedure, including attempts to pass waiting ...
That means if a national abortion ban were to be enacted, Proposition 1 may not be able to protect New Yorkers. Abortion rights measures were passed in six other states, including Arizona ...
The vast majority of voters support Prop 1, and AAPI New Yorkers – myself included – know that protecting our rights and freedoms, including the right to abortion, is at stake this election ...
At the time, New York State was a Republican "trifecta", meaning both chambers of the legislature and the governorship were Republican-controlled. [14] The 1970 law did several things. First, it added a consent provision requiring a physician to obtain the woman's consent before performing an abortion. [ 16 ]
Amendment 1 Exempts local laws or local constitutional amendments from the budget isolation resolution process. Mar 5 >50% 341,515 48.69% 359,850 51.31%: California: Legislature: Approved Proposition 1: Reforms the Mental Health Services Act and issues $6.38 billion in bonds for homeless individuals and veterans. Mar 5 >50% 3,636,678 50.18% ...
(Prop 1) does not change existing law when it comes to young people and sports teams. In fact, this works hand in hand with Title IX.” Notably absent from the proposition is the word “abortion.”
Abortion is the termination of human pregnancy, often performed in the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. In 1973, the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade recognized a constitutional right to obtain an abortion without excessive government restriction, and in 1992 the Court in Planned Parenthood v.