Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A closing argument, summation, or summing up is the concluding statement of each party's counsel reiterating the important arguments for the trier of fact, often the jury, in a court case. A closing argument occurs after the presentation of evidence. A closing argument may not contain any new information and may only use evidence introduced at ...
After a lunch break, into what approached an almost four-hour-long closing statement, Roos rested his case: "The defendant is overwhelmingly, beyond reasonable doubt, guilty." 'Bad business decisions'
Closing statement may refer to: Closing argument , or "summation", the concluding statement of each party's counsel in a court case Closing statement (real estate) , a document describing a real estate transaction
For example, an appellate brief to the highest court in a jurisdiction calls for a formal style—this shows proper respect for the court and for the legal matter at issue. An interoffice legal memorandum to a supervisor can probably be less formal—though not colloquial—because it is an in-house decision-making tool, not a court document.
Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court, has written roughly 100 opinions in more than three years on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Her opinions ...
In the law, a close case is generally defined as a ruling that could conceivably be decided in more than one way. [1] Various scholars have attempted to articulate criteria for identifying close cases, [2] and commentators have observed that reliance upon precedent established in close cases leads to the gradual expansion of legal doctrines.
Dr. Eshtehardi says that a good "I statement" has two main parts: the feeling, thought or need, and the observation. For example, you might say, "I feel frustrated when you walk away while I'm ...
The debate over appellate jurisdiction on federal tax matters has been focused primarily on two issues: how best to achieve greater uniformity in federal tax decisions and whether the diversity in tax jurisdiction compromises the quality of decisions resolving tax disputes or is a strength of the system. [2]