enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Breakup of the Bell System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakup_of_the_Bell_System

    The new AT&T Inc. lacks the vertical integration that characterized the historic AT&T Corporation and led to the Department of Justice antitrust suit. [23] AT&T Inc. announced it would not switch back to the Bell logo, [24] thus ending corporate use of the Bell logo by the Baby Bells, with the lone exception of Verizon.

  3. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T_Mobility_LLC_v...

    AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...

  4. United States v. AT&T (2019) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._AT&T_(2019)

    United States of America v. AT&T Inc., et al. Argued: December 6, 2018: Decided: February 26, 2019: Citation: 916 F.3d 1029: Case history; Prior history: 310 F.Supp.3d 161 (D.D.C., 2018) Holding; The U.S. government was unable to prove that the takeover of TimeWarner by AT&T was harmful to competition or consumer welfare. Court membership ...

  5. Hedges Amicus Brief FINAL - HuffPost

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-02-01-ThreeAmigos...

    CHRISTOPHER HEDGES, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BARACK OBAMA, individually and as representative of the United States of America, et al., Defendants. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Case No. 12-cv-331 Brief of Amici Curiae Senators John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Kelly Ayotte

  6. United States v. AT&T (1982) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._AT&T_(1982)

    United States v. AT&T, 552 F.Supp. 131 (1982), was a ruling of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, [1] that led to the 1984 Bell System divestiture, and the breakup of the old AT&T natural monopoly into seven regional Bell operating companies and a much smaller new version of AT&T.

  7. AT&T - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T

    AT&T was founded as Bell Telephone Company by Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Watson and Gardiner Greene Hubbard after Bell's patenting of the telephone in 1875. [22] By 1881, Bell Telephone Company had become the American Bell Telephone Company. [23]

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. FCC v. AT&T Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_v._AT&T_Inc.

    Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc., 562 U.S. 397 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case on aspects of corporate personhood.It held that the exemption from Freedom of Information Act disclosure requirements for law enforcement records which "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy" does not protect information related to ...

  1. Related searches martin vs at&t et al summary brief pdf form printable

    martin vs at&t et al summary brief pdf form printable free