Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Socratic questioning (or Socratic maieutics) [1] is an educational method named after Socrates that focuses on discovering answers by asking questions of students. According to Plato, Socrates believed that "the disciplined practice of thoughtful questioning enables the scholar/student to examine ideas and be able to determine the validity of those ideas". [2]
Hosted by comedian Jeff Foxworthy, the original show asked adult contestants to answer questions typically found in elementary school quizzes with the help of actual fifth-graders as teammates ...
Worksheets give immediate feedback, allow for repeated practice, make students active rather than passive learners and allow students to ask for help from the instructor. Drawbacks include students' uneven readiness the substantial time required to complete. Students worked in groups on two occasions. In the first, four worksheets were supplied.
The Socratic method (also known as the method of Elenchus or Socratic debate) is a form of argumentative dialogue between individuals based on asking and answering questions. Socratic dialogues feature in many of the works of the ancient Greek philosopher Plato , where his teacher Socrates debates various philosophical issues with an ...
The German educational scientist Michael Siegmund recommends asking children a philosophical question along with an inspiring picture. Together, the image and question create an opening for discussing philosophy. Among other things, natural landscapes, pictures of animals and people, certain social situations, or even fantasy pictures can be used.
In the United Kingdom (excluding Scotland), the Five Ws are used in Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 3 lessons (ages 7–14). [6] In data analytics, the Five Ws are used in the first stage of the BADIR to identify the business problem and its context in an analytics request.
Those who use precision questioning (also called "PQers") describe [citation needed] PQ conversations as those analytical opportunities motivated by an attempt to get to precise answers, or to identify where no answer is available. However, when "drilling" into a topic, practitioners endeavor to avoid the use of personalization (blame or shame).
Afterwards, judges ask students follow-up questions to test the depth of their knowledge on the topic in a six-minute question and answer period. [3] During the national finals over 1,200 students from 56 classes testify before a total of 72 judges, in panels of three.