enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Professor's Cube - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professor's_Cube

    As illustrated to the right, the fixed centers, middle edges and corners can be treated as equivalent to a 3×3×3 cube. As a result, once reduction is complete the parity errors sometimes seen on the 4×4×4 cannot occur on the 5×5×5, or any cube with an odd number of layers. [9] The Yau5 method is named after its proposer, Robert Yau.

  3. Rubik's family cubes of varying sizes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubik's_family_cubes_of...

    The parity of a given algorithm can, of course, also be deduced from its content using the rules detailed in the Rules for Rubik’s family cubes section. For standard cubes the rearrangement of centre cubies to resolve the OLL and PLL problems is unimportant.

  4. Combination puzzle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combination_puzzle

    Solutions to this cube is similar to a regular 3x3x3 except that odd-parity combinations are possible with this puzzle. This cube uses a special mechanism due to absence of a central core. Commercial name: Crazy cube type I Crazy cube type II Cube: 4x4x4. The inner circles of a Crazy cube 4x4x4 move with the second layer of each face.

  5. 15 puzzle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_puzzle

    The invariant is the parity of the permutation of all 16 squares plus the parity of the taxicab distance (number of rows plus number of columns) of the empty square from the lower right corner. This is an invariant because each move changes both the parity of the permutation and the parity of the taxicab distance.

  6. Megaminx - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megaminx

    The Megaminx has 20 corners and 30 edges. It is possible on a Rubik's Cube to have a single pair of corners and a single pair of edges swapped, with the rest of the puzzle being solved. The corner and edge permutations are each odd in this example, but their sum is even. This parity situation is impossible on the Megaminx.

  7. Optimal solutions for the Rubik's Cube - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimal_solutions_for_the...

    The first upper bounds were based on the 'human' algorithms. By combining the worst-case scenarios for each part of these algorithms, the typical upper bound was found to be around 100. Perhaps the first concrete value for an upper bound was the 277 moves mentioned by David Singmaster in early 1979. He simply counted the maximum number of moves ...

  8. College football Week 7 winners and losers: How would a 12 ...

    www.aol.com/sports/college-football-week-7...

    7. Penn State Nittany Lions (6-0) We’ll know a lot more about the Nittany Lions and Buckeyes in Week 8 after they face off. Saturday was a tuneup for Penn State in an easy win over UMass.

  9. Rubik's Revenge - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubik's_Revenge

    A solved Rubik's Revenge cube. The Rubik's Revenge (also known as the 4×4×4 Rubik's Cube) is a 4×4×4 version of the Rubik's Cube.It was released in 1981. Invented by Péter Sebestény, the cube was nearly called the Sebestény Cube until a somewhat last-minute decision changed the puzzle's name to attract fans of the original Rubik's Cube. [1]