Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) identifies the human causes of an accident and offers tools for analysis as a way to plan preventive training. [1]
This research is accomplished within two laboratories in support of the FAA Air Traffic Organization, the Flight Deck Human Factors Research Laboratory and the National Airspace System (NAS) Human Factors Safety Research Laboratory. Research facilities within these laboratories include head-mounted display systems and numerous aircraft control ...
MIL-STD 1472 DoD Design Criteria Standard for Human Engineering. FAA Human Factors Design Standards (HFDS) HF-STD-001B. HFE Data Information Descriptions: Human Engineering Program Plan (HEPP) DI-HFAC- 81742. Human Engineering Systems Analysis Report (HESAR) DI-HFAC-80745. Human Engineering Design Approach Document (HEDAD-M) DI-HFAC-80747
In conjunction with ARP4754, ARP4761 is used to demonstrate compliance with 14 CFR 25.1309 in the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airworthiness regulations for transport category aircraft, and also harmonized international airworthiness regulations such as European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) CS–25.1309.
Human-rating certification, also known as man-rating or crew-rating, is the certification of a spacecraft or launch vehicle as capable of safely transporting humans. There is no one particular standard for human-rating a spacecraft or launch vehicle, and the various entities that launch or plan to launch such spacecraft specify requirements for their particular systems to be human-rated.
Military Human Factors Archived May 14, 2008, at the Wayback Machine; Crew Resource Management Current Regulatory Paper; Crew Resource Management for the Fire Service Archived July 15, 2011, at the Wayback Machine; TeamSTEPPS Program from the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Flight-crew human factors handbook (CAP 737)
Once this task description has been constructed a nominal human unreliability score for the particular task is then determined, usually by consulting local experts. Based around this calculated point, a 5th – 95th percentile confidence range is established.
The FAA Fail-Safe Design Concept and design principles or techniques for safe design are maintained. However, owing to the increasing development of Highly Integrated Systems in aircraft, qualitative controls previously considered necessary for safe software development are extended to the aircraft function level. [ 6 ] (