Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
MIL-STD 1472 DoD Design Criteria Standard for Human Engineering. FAA Human Factors Design Standards (HFDS) HF-STD-001B. HFE Data Information Descriptions: Human Engineering Program Plan (HEPP) DI-HFAC- 81742. Human Engineering Systems Analysis Report (HESAR) DI-HFAC-80745. Human Engineering Design Approach Document (HEDAD-M) DI-HFAC-80747
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). October 16, 2012. AC 25-7C. "NASA Procedural Requirements, Human-Rating Requirements for Space Systems, Chapter 3 - Technical Requirements for Human-Rating". NASA. July 10, 2017. NPR 8705.2C. "Aeronautical Design Standard Performance Specification: Handling Qualities Requirements for Military Rotorcraft ...
Human-rating certification, also known as man-rating or crew-rating, is the certification of a spacecraft or launch vehicle as capable of safely transporting humans. There is no one particular standard for human-rating a spacecraft or launch vehicle, and the various entities that launch or plan to launch such spacecraft specify requirements for their particular systems to be human-rated.
In conjunction with ARP4754, ARP4761 is used to demonstrate compliance with 14 CFR 25.1309 in the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airworthiness regulations for transport category aircraft, and also harmonized international airworthiness regulations such as European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) CS–25.1309.
Title 14 CFR – Aeronautics and Space is one of the fifty titles that make up the United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Title 14 is the principal set of rules and regulations (sometimes called administrative law) issued by the Department of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration, federal agencies of the United States which oversee Aeronautics and Space.
The FAA Fail-Safe Design Concept and design principles or techniques for safe design are maintained. However, owing to the increasing development of Highly Integrated Systems in aircraft, qualitative controls previously considered necessary for safe software development are extended to the aircraft function level. [ 6 ] (
In the U.S., the MAX shares a compatible type rating throughout the Boeing 737 series. [25] The impetus for Boeing to build the 737 MAX was serious competition from the Airbus A320neo, which was a threat to win a major order for aircraft from American Airlines, a traditional customer for Boeing airplanes. [26]
Military Human Factors Archived May 14, 2008, at the Wayback Machine; Crew Resource Management Current Regulatory Paper; Crew Resource Management for the Fire Service Archived July 15, 2011, at the Wayback Machine; TeamSTEPPS Program from the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Flight-crew human factors handbook (CAP 737)