Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Once this task description has been constructed a nominal human unreliability score for the particular task is then determined, usually by consulting local experts. Based around this calculated point, a 5th – 95th percentile confidence range is established.
MIL-STD 1472 DoD Design Criteria Standard for Human Engineering. FAA Human Factors Design Standards (HFDS) HF-STD-001B. HFE Data Information Descriptions: Human Engineering Program Plan (HEPP) DI-HFAC- 81742. Human Engineering Systems Analysis Report (HESAR) DI-HFAC-80745. Human Engineering Design Approach Document (HEDAD-M) DI-HFAC-80747
Maintenance resource management (MRM) training is an aircraft maintenance variant on crew resource management (CRM). Although the term MRM was used for several years following CRM's introduction, the first governmental guidance for standardized MRM training and its team-based safety approach, appeared when the FAA (U.S.) issued Advisory Circular 120-72, Maintenance Resource Management Training ...
Military Human Factors Archived May 14, 2008, at the Wayback Machine; Crew Resource Management Current Regulatory Paper; Crew Resource Management for the Fire Service Archived July 15, 2011, at the Wayback Machine; TeamSTEPPS Program from the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Flight-crew human factors handbook (CAP 737)
An Air Malta crewman performing a pre-flight inspection of an Airbus A320.. Aviation safety is the study and practice of managing risks in aviation. This includes preventing aviation accidents and incidents through research, educating air travel personnel, passengers and the general public, as well as the design of aircraft and aviation infrastructure.
Human-rating certification, also known as man-rating or crew-rating, is the certification of a spacecraft or launch vehicle as capable of safely transporting humans. There is no one particular standard for human-rating a spacecraft or launch vehicle, and the various entities that launch or plan to launch such spacecraft specify requirements for their particular systems to be human-rated.
The FAA Fail-Safe Design Concept and design principles or techniques for safe design are maintained. However, owing to the increasing development of Highly Integrated Systems in aircraft, qualitative controls previously considered necessary for safe software development are extended to the aircraft function level. [ 6 ] (
In conjunction with ARP4754, ARP4761 is used to demonstrate compliance with 14 CFR 25.1309 in the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airworthiness regulations for transport category aircraft, and also harmonized international airworthiness regulations such as European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) CS–25.1309.