enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ohio v. Robinette - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_v._Robinette

    Ohio v. Robinette , 519 U.S. 33 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's car .

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Ohio v. Robinette: 519 U.S. 33 (1996) informing motorists that a traffic stop has ended and the motorist is "free to go" is not required under the Fourth Amendment: Caterpillar, Inc. v. Lewis: 519 U.S. 61 (1996) diversity of citizenship must exist at the time of entry of judgment M.L.B. v. S.L.J. 519 U.S. 102 (1996)

  4. List of consent to search case law articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_consent_to_search...

    Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990) - search valid if police reasonably believe consent given by owner; Florida v. Bostick (1991) - not "free to leave" but "free to decline" on bus; Florida v. Jimeno (1991) - can request officer to limit scope of search; Ohio v. Robinette (1996) - do not have to inform motorist is free to go; United States v.

  5. Terry stop - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop

    As decided in Ohio v. Robinette (1996), after an officer returns the driver's identification, there is no requirement that the officer inform the driver of his or her freedom to leave; therefore, although the encounter has changed to a consensual encounter, questioning can continue, including a request to search the vehicle. [34]

  6. Costco eggs recalled were given a recall of the highest level by the Food and Drug Administration for potential contamination with salmonella.

  7. Get breaking news and the latest headlines on business, entertainment, politics, world news, tech, sports, videos and much more from AOL

  8. Consent search - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent_search

    The person has the right to refuse to give consent, and except in limited cases may revoke consent at any point during the search. In addition, the prosecution in any trial using the search results as evidence is required to prove that the consent was voluntary and not a result of coercion.

  9. College Football Playoff: Which teams are in position for the ...

    www.aol.com/sports/college-football-playoff...

    The College Football Playoff cake is getting close to baked, which means much of the angst and anger of the past few weeks over hypothetical and projected scenarios have proved a waste of time.