Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Modern proof theory treats proofs as inductively defined data structures, not requiring an assumption that axioms are "true" in any sense. This allows parallel mathematical theories as formal models of a given intuitive concept, based on alternate sets of axioms, for example axiomatic set theory and non-Euclidean geometry.
Mathematical induction can be informally illustrated by reference to the sequential effect of falling dominoes. [1] [2]Mathematical induction is a method for proving that a statement () is true for every natural number, that is, that the infinitely many cases (), (), (), (), … all hold.
A consequence of the classification of finite simple groups, completed in 2004 by the usual standards of pure mathematics. 2004: Adam Marcus and Gábor Tardos: Stanley–Wilf conjecture: permutation classes: Marcus–Tardos theorem 2004: Ualbai U. Umirbaev and Ivan P. Shestakov: Nagata's conjecture on automorphisms: polynomial rings: 2004
A typical example is the proof of the proposition "there is no smallest positive rational number": assume there is a smallest positive rational number q and derive a contradiction by observing that q / 2 is even smaller than q and still positive.
The union of the assumption sets at lines m and n, excluding k (the denied assumption). [17] From a sentence and its denial [b] at lines m and n, infer the denial of any assumption appearing in the proof (at line k). [17] Double arrow introduction [17] Biconditional definition (Df ↔), [22] biconditional introduction: m, n ↔ I [17]
For example, some unicellular organisms have genomes much larger than that of humans. Cole's paradox: Even a tiny fecundity advantage of one additional offspring would favor the evolution of semelparity. Gray's paradox: Despite their relatively small muscle mass, dolphins can swim at high speeds and obtain large accelerations.
In mathematics, certain kinds of mistaken proof are often exhibited, and sometimes collected, as illustrations of a concept called mathematical fallacy.There is a distinction between a simple mistake and a mathematical fallacy in a proof, in that a mistake in a proof leads to an invalid proof while in the best-known examples of mathematical fallacies there is some element of concealment or ...
Examples include the class of all groups, the class of all vector spaces, and many others. In category theory, a category whose collection of objects forms a proper class (or whose collection of morphisms forms a proper class) is called a large category. The surreal numbers are a proper class of objects that have the properties of a field.