Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The template is used to identify claims in articles, particularly if questionable, that lack a citation to a reliable source. Template parameters Parameter Description Type Status Month and year date Provides the month and year of the citation request; e.g., 'January 2013', but not 'jan13' Auto value {{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}} String suggested Reason for citation reason A ...
A false accusation is a claim or allegation of wrongdoing that is untrue and/or otherwise unsupported by facts. [1] False accusations are also known as groundless accusations, unfounded accusations, false allegations, false claims or unsubstantiated allegations. They can occur in any of the following contexts: Informally in everyday life
Template:More citations needed for an article (rather than an individual statement) that has some citations, but not enough. Template messages – Sources of articles; Inline verifiability and sources cleanup templates; Wikipedia:Verification methods – listing examples of the most common ways that citations are used in Wikipedia articles
Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects Wikidata item; Appearance. move to sidebar hide. Template documentation. This is a group of templates which aim ...
Without a citation, unsupported content may be deleted because the content may be considered incorrect. Wikipedia editors can make mistakes, and assuming what you think is common knowledge may not be accepted as common knowledge by others. Set an example by citing your content properly, whether you think it is common or uncommon.
Process analysis is a form of technical writing and expository writing "designed to convey to the reader how a change takes place through a series of stages". [1]While the traditional process analysis and a set of instructions are both organized chronologically, the reader of a process analysis is typically interested in understanding the chronological components of a system that operates ...
Controversial facts or claims come with criticisms. [10] Deal with them. Include criticisms about your fact. Lean over backwards to identify reliably-sourced criticisms against the controversial point. It's controversial for a reason, and don't say it's because slobs misunderstand it or hate you (or because they don't understand the topic).
Hasty generalization is the fallacy of examining just one or very few examples or studying a single case and generalizing that to be representative of the whole class of objects or phenomena. The opposite, slothful induction , is the fallacy of denying the logical conclusion of an inductive argument, dismissing an effect as "just a coincidence ...