Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc., 643 A.2d 642 (App. Div. 1994), was a case decided by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey that first applied public policy considerations instead of the touch and concern doctrine when deciding the validity of a restrictive covenant.
Every county recorder in California will establish a program to identify and redact unlawfully restrictive covenants from the state’s real The post California law requiring removal of racial ...
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case that held that racially restrictive housing covenants cannot legally be enforced.. The case arose after an African-American family purchased a house in St. Louis that was subject to a restrictive covenant preventing "people of the Negro or Mongolian Race" from occupying the property.
In advocating support for a federal constitutional amendment guaranteeing the legal enforcement of racially restrictive covenants, the California Real Estate Association publication stated that "millions of home owners of the Caucasian race have constructed or acquired homes in areas restricted against occupancy by Negroes.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
A tax levy is a legal mechanism that allows a tax authority to seize your property or assets to satisfy unpaid tax debts. “The government can levy salaries, social security payments and bank ...
A full coverage search is usually done when creating a title report for sale/resale transactions and for transaction that involves construction loans. It generally includes searches related to property lien, easements, covenants, conditions and restrictions(CC&Rs), agreements, resolutions and ordinances that will affect the real property in question.
private racially restrictive covenants: Myers v. United States: 272 U.S. 52 (1926) Presidential authority to remove executive branch officials Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co. 272 U.S. 365 (1926) zoning, due process: United States v. General Electric Co. 272 U.S. 476 (1926)