Ads
related to: revert pdf to previous versionashampoo.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
To see the changes the rollback button will revert, view the specific diff that compares the last version from the last editor with the last version from the previous editor. The rollback link looks similar to this:
If you revert by manually changing the text to the old version, they will not receive a notification, which some editors appreciate. If the edits you revert are clearly disruptive or vandalism , it may be better not to notify the disruptor or vandal of your correction, by reverting manually.
Often when an article version contains more than one disagreeable passage, it is easy to revert to a previous version. This gets rid of all the "mistakes" in a few seconds, but it also can eliminate "good stuff", discourage other editors, and spark an edit war.
Reverting to a prior version is appropriate only if, after looking at one or more edits, you decide that the most recent edit or edits should be reversed; for example, someone has just vandalized a page and the next-to-last version of the page is vandalism-free. Doing this type of revert is a four-step process, starting from the history page: 1.
If there were an "edit this version (for reversion purposes only!)" button in the diff-viewing page, it'd help: Check the diff. Click "edit". Add summary and save. I propose that. (In fact, if there were a "revert to this version with summary ____" form on the diff page, it'd be even fewer steps: Check the diff. Add summary and revert.
The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.
Ads
related to: revert pdf to previous versionashampoo.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month