enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fact Monster - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact_Monster

    It is owned by Infoplease [1] and, like the Infoplease site, it contains several reference works under one umbrella, including the Columbia Encyclopedia, Random House Dictionary, an atlas and an almanac.

  3. Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check

    A 2018 year-in-review and prospective on fact-checking from the Poynter Institute (which develops PolitiFact [27]) noted a proliferation of credibility score projects, including Media/Bias Fact Check, writing that "While these projects are, in theory, a good addition to the efforts combating misinformation, they have the potential to misfire ...

  4. For instance, otherwise unreliable self-published sources are usually acceptable to support uncontroversial information about the source's author. You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about living people. These are general guidelines, but the topic of reliable sources is a complicated one, and is ...

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources checklist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    Here's a checklist to help organize your evaluation of a source. Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article. No source is always unreliable for every statement, and no source is always reliable for any statement.

  6. Wikipedia:When sources are wrong - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:When_sources_are...

    The second option was settled on at least provisionally, and then, coincidentally, a new reliable source came out that did question the arrest, a deus ex machina that thankfully resolved the dispute but annoyingly prevented the possibility of a full case study into the extreme edge case of an article where 100% of sources may be wrong. As of ...

  7. Wikipedia : Identifying and using self-published works

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    According to our content guideline on identifying reliable sources, a reliable source has the following characteristics: It has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. It is published. It is appropriate for the material in question, i.e., the source is directly about the subject, rather than mentioning something unrelated in passing.

  8. Help:Find sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Find_sources

    Reliable sources allow editors to verify that claims in an article are accurate. The higher the quality of the source for the statement it backs up, the more likely that statement is to be accurate. Independent sources help editors to write neutrally and to prove that the subject has received note. Wherever possible, editors should aim to use ...

  9. Wikipedia:Suggested sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suggested_sources

    WP:BLP - rules about living people, and what not to quote from sources. Other essays: WP:Reliable source examples - general issues to consider. Specific questions: WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard - ask about specific sources. However, editors new to a particular topic might not realize some specific major publications are preferred as sources.