enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:What is a reliable source? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_is_a...

    A reliable source is one that presents a well-reasoned theory or argument supported by strong evidence. Reliable sources include scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books written by researchers for students and researchers, which can be found in academic databases and search engines like JSTOR and Google Scholar.

  3. Fact Monster - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact_Monster

    It is owned by Infoplease [1] and, like the Infoplease site, it contains several reference works under one umbrella, including the Columbia Encyclopedia, Random House Dictionary, an atlas and an almanac.

  4. List of fact-checking websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fact-checking_websites

    Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. Please help improve this article by looking for better, more reliable sources. Unreliable citations may be ...

  5. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    I consider that the evidence from Wikipedia can be taken at face value." The case turned substantively upon evidence cited from Wikipedia in 2006 as to the usage and interpretation of the term Formula One. In the United States, the United States Court of Federal Claims has ruled that "Wikipedia may not be a reliable source of information."

  6. Wikipedia:Tiers of reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tiers_of_reliability

    Potentially unreliable sources ; Reliable source examples ; Topic-specific essays. Identifying reliable sources (history) Identifying reliable sources (law) Identifying reliable sources (science) Identifying reliable sources (medicine) Identifying and using style guides (WP:STYLEGUIDES)

  7. Fact-checking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact-checking

    Highly credible sources are the most effective, especially those which surprisingly report facts against their own perceived bias; Reframing the issue by adding context can be more effective than simply labeling it as incorrect or unproven. Challenging readers' identity or worldview reduces effectiveness.

  8. Wikipedia:Acceptable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Acceptable_sources

    Pseudonymous source may be acceptable, especially if a person is well-known by a pseudonym; however pseudonymous sources may pose additional difficulties with the next requirement. Authenticity. Sources must have some evidence of authenticity; we must be reasonably sure that sources are not forgeries or misrepresentations.

  9. Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability...

    Consequently, some judgment and comparison of sources is needed in order to identify reliable sources. Reliable sources respect truth; a source that is commonly untruthful is not reliable. A source may be partly or more or less reliable. Concurrence of possibly reliable sources may help in identifying reliable sources, and editors should seek it.