Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Definition and use English pron a fortiori: from stronger An a fortiori argument is an "argument from a stronger reason", meaning that, because one fact is true, a second (related and included) fact must also be true. / ˌ eɪ f ɔːr t i ˈ oʊ r aɪ, ˌ eɪ f ɔːr ʃ i ˈ oʊ r aɪ / a mensa et thoro: from table and bed
The original meaning was similar to "the game is afoot", but its modern meaning, like that of the phrase "crossing the Rubicon", denotes passing the point of no return on a momentous decision and entering into a risky endeavor where the outcome is left to chance. alenda lux ubi orta libertas: Let light be nourished where liberty has arisen
Accessory (legal term) An accessory is a person who assists, but does not actually participate, in the commission of a crime. The distinction between an accessory and a principal is a question of fact and degree: The principal is the one whose acts or omissions, accompanied by the relevant mens rea (Latin for "guilty mind"), are the most ...
Proximate cause is a key principle of insurance and is concerned with how the loss or damage actually occurred. There are several competing theories of proximate cause (see Other factors). For an act to be deemed to cause a harm, both tests must be met; proximate cause is a legal limitation on cause-in-fact. The formal Latin term for "but for ...
Ipso facto is a Latin phrase, directly translated as "by the fact itself", [1] which means that a specific phenomenon is a direct consequence, a resultant effect, of the action in question, instead of being brought about by a previous action. (Contrast this with the expressions "by itself" or "per se".) It is a term of art used in philosophy ...
Evidence. In a legal dispute, one party has the burden of proof to show that they are correct, while the other party has no such burden and is presumed to be correct. The burden of proof requires a party to produce evidence to establish the truth of facts needed to satisfy all the required legal elements of the dispute.
De facto (/ deɪˈfæktoʊ, di -, də -/ day FAK-toh, dee -, də -; [ 1 ]Latin: [deː ˈfaktoː] ⓘ; lit.'in fact') describes practices that exist in reality, regardless of whether they are officially recognized by laws or other formal norms. [ 2 ][ 3 ] It is commonly used to refer to what happens in practice, in contrast with de jure ...
Hume's fork. Hume's fork, in epistemology, is a tenet elaborating upon British empiricist philosopher David Hume 's emphatic, 1730s division between "relations of ideas" and "matters of fact." [1][2] (Alternatively, Hume's fork may refer to what is otherwise termed Hume's law, a tenet of ethics.) [3] As phrased in Immanuel Kant's 1780s ...