enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Breakup of the Bell System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakup_of_the_Bell_System

    The new AT&T Inc. lacks the vertical integration that characterized the historic AT&T Corporation and led to the Department of Justice antitrust suit. [23] AT&T Inc. announced it would not switch back to the Bell logo, [24] thus ending corporate use of the Bell logo by the Baby Bells, with the lone exception of Verizon.

  3. PDF - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDF

    Interactive Forms is a mechanism to add forms to the PDF file format. PDF currently supports two different methods for integrating data and PDF forms. Both formats today coexist in the PDF specification: [38] [53] [54] [55] AcroForms (also known as Acrobat forms), introduced in the PDF 1.2 format specification and included in all later PDF ...

  4. United States v. AT&T - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._AT&T

    United States v. AT&T may refer to several court cases: United States v. AT&T, a lawsuit enforcing the divestiture of the Bell System; United States v. AT&T, a lawsuit attempting to block a merger with Time Warner

  5. Dow Showdown: Intel vs. AT&T - AOL

    www.aol.com/2012/03/20/dow-showdown-intel-vs-att

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  7. AT&T - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T

    AT&T was founded as Bell Telephone Company by Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Watson and Gardiner Greene Hubbard after Bell's patenting of the telephone in 1875. [21] By 1881, Bell Telephone Company had become the American Bell Telephone Company. [22]

  8. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. AT&T Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MCI_Telecommunications_Corp...

    MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. AT&T Co., 512 U.S. 218 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court case about whether the Federal Communications Commission could set aside the requirement that each telecommunications common carrier file a tariff establishing fixed terms and prices for its services.

  9. Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_v._District_of...

    James Martin was a serial abuser of the court’s certiorari process; in the past decade following the court’s per curium opinion, Martin filed 45 petitions relating to being incarcerated for an unrelated offense, and the last 15 petitions for the prior two years were dismissed under the court’s rule 39.8. [4]