Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Recently, an $8.85 million settlement was reached in a class action lawsuit filed against Unilever United States, Inc., the owner of Breyers, and Conopco, Inc., the New York-based advertiser ...
Breyers is paying out a nearly $9 million settlement as part of a class-action lawsuit filed against Conopco, Inc., and Unilever United States, Inc. ... The lawsuit also alleges that the ice cream ...
Too Much Ice in Starbucks' Drinks? One time, there was a dude who thought he could take on all of Starbucks by slamming them with a class-action lawsuit over the amount of ice in the cups.
Kweku Hanson#Class action lawsuit against Ocwen Federal FSB; Lead contamination in Washington, D.C. drinking water#Class-action lawsuit; Long-term effects of benzodiazepines#Class-action lawsuit; Lowe's#Lawsuits; MMR vaccine controversy#MMR litigation starts; Mannatech#Securities Exchange Act class-action lawsuit; Match.com#Controversy
[30] [31] [32] After the announcement Oatly's stock briefly went below IPO, resulting in several class-action lawsuits. [33] Glenn Vanzura of Mayer Brown stated that it is common in other industries that after a short-seller targets a company to drive down stock price, a class action lawsuit is filed, noting that such lawsuits are often ...
Magee v. McDonald's is a United States federal class action lawsuit begun in May 2016 in the Illinois Northern District Court, case number 1:16-cv-05652, in which Scott Magee of Metairie, Louisiana is pursuing action against McDonald's due to the company being unwilling to serve people who are visually impaired when only the drive thru lane is ...
The lawsuits drove the company to declare bankruptcy in 1995, before it agreed to pay $2.3 billion to settle claims from 240,000 women in amounts ranging from $2,000 to $250,000 each in 2004 ...
Frosty Treats, Inc. v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., 426 F.3d 1001 (8th Cir. 2005), [1] is a trademark case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that the name of one of the largest ice cream truck franchise companies in the United States was neither distinctive nor famous enough to receive protection against being used in a violent video game.