Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd This page was last edited on 4 December 2014, at 08:15 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike ...
Designer Guild Limited v. Russell Williams (Textiles) Limited (Trading As Washington DC) Court: House of Lords: Decided: November 23, 2000: Citation [2001] E.C.D.R. 10: Transcript: transcript: Court membership; Judges sitting: Lord Bingham of Cornhill Lord Hoffmann Lord Hope of Craighead Lord Millett Lord Scott of Foscote
Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1989] EWCA Civ 5 is a leading English contract law case. It decided that in varying a contract, a promise to perform a pre-existing contractual obligation will constitute good consideration so long as a benefit is conferred upon the 'promiseor'.
In Bridges v Mees [1957] Ch. 475, Harman J. decided that a purchaser of land under a contract for sale, who had paid the price and so was entitled to the land in equity, could acquire an overriding interest by virtue of actual occupation, and a similar position was held by the Court of Appeal to arise in relation to a resulting trust (Hodgson v ...
Williams v. Reed, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that state laws requiring exhaustion of state administrative remedies are preempted by 42 U.S.C. § 1983 of the federal Ku Klux Klan Act when they prevent a state court from hearing claims challenging delays in the administrative process.
Scottish Co-op Wholesale Society Ltd v Meyer; Seaford Court Estates Ltd v Asher; Shell UK Ltd v Lostock Garages Ltd; Smith and Snipes Hall Farm Ltd v River Douglas Catchment Board; Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd
The post Vince Williams Reportedly Makes His Free Agency Decision appeared first on The Spun. Williams re-signed with the Steelers this afternoon, according to ESPN’s Jeremy Fowler.
Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States, 487 F.2d 1345 (Ct. Cl. 1973), was an important intellectual property decision by the federal Court of Claims, later affirmed by a per curiam opinion from an evenly divided United States Supreme Court, with only eight justices voting (Harry Blackmun took no part in the decision of this case).