enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ignorantia juris non excusat - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignorantia_juris_non_excusat

    In law, ignorantia juris non excusat (Latin for "ignorance of the law excuses not"), [1] or ignorantia legis neminem excusat ("ignorance of law excuses no one"), [2] is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely by being unaware of its content.

  3. Vincible and invincible ignorance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincible_and_invincible...

    Vincible ignorance is, in Catholic moral theology, ignorance that a person could remove by applying reasonable diligence in the given set of circumstances.It contrasts with invincible ignorance, which a person is either entirely incapable of removing, or could only do so by supererogatory efforts (i.e., efforts above and beyond normal duty).

  4. Mistake of law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistake_of_law

    There is a principle of law that "ignorance of the law is no excuse." In criminal cases, a mistake of law is not a recognized defense, though such a mistake may in very rare instances fall under the legal category of "exculpation". In criminal cases a mistake of fact is normally called simply, "mistake".

  5. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. But not knowing this law ...

    www.aol.com/news/ignorance-law-no-excuse-not...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Willful ignorance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willful_ignorance

    Willful ignorance is sometimes called willful blindness, contrived ignorance, conscious avoidance, [4] intentional ignorance, or Nelsonian knowledge. [ 5 ] The jury instruction for willful blindness is sometimes called the " ostrich instruction ".

  7. Mistake (criminal law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistake_(criminal_law)

    The Criminal Code contains specific provisions dealing with ignorance and mistakes, which permits acquittal in cases of mistakes of fact but not of law. Further, it mandates that a mistake of fact need not be reasonable for the defense to be available, but allows a jury to consider whether a fact is unreasonable in determining whether the ...

  8. Tolling (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolling_(law)

    The application of equitable tolling focuses on the plaintiff's excusable ignorance of the limitations period and on the lack of prejudice to the defendant. [16] Equitable tolling does not require active deception or employer misconduct, but focuses rather on whether the plaintiff acted with a reasonably prudent regard for his rights. [15]

  9. Excuse - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excuse

    For example, suppose that a group of terrorists kidnap A's family and instruct A to carry a large bomb into a crowded area as the price for the release of their family. If A carries out these instructions, making no effort to contact the police or to warn those in the danger area, the issue of liability for death and injury resulting depends on ...