Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
State Farm has lodged a case in the U.S. Supreme Court, 'State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United States ex rel. Rigsby, to be heard in the term which commences in October 2016. State Farm is arguing that the attorneys for the Rigsbys violated a part of the False Claims Act, that is they released documents which were under the 60 day seal rule.
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company is an insurance company. [3] Prior to 2005, State Farm offered two types [fn 1] of insurance policies to homeowners: flood insurance, which would be reimbursed by the federal government's National Flood Insurance Program, and general homeowner insurance, which would be paid directly by State Farm. [3]
And so they’ve launched two class-action suits, one in Florida and the other in Georgia, claiming State Farm uniformly rejects repair estimates that exceed $4,700 per claim — when the market ...
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the due process clause usually limits punitive damage awards to less than ten times the size of the compensatory damages awarded and that punitive damage awards of four times the compensatory damage award is "close to the line of constitutional impropriety".
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The state superintendent of insurance wanted to force State Farm to pay $5,000 in living expenses to people who had to evacuate as a result of the South Fork and Salt fires if their policies ...
In 2006, two former State Farm claims adjusters, sisters Cori and Kerri Rigsby, acted as whistleblowers and filed a qui tam suit against State Farm under the False Claims Act. [ citation needed ] The Rigsby sisters claimed that State Farm shifted state claims to federal flood insurance that should have been covered by private wind insurance ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us