enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: privacy case cell phone

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Carpenter v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpenter_v._United_States

    Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. 296 (2018), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the privacy of historical cell site location information (CSLI). The Court held that government entities violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when accessing historical CSLI records containing the physical locations of cellphones without a search warrant.

  3. Riley v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riley_v._California

    Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [1] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.

  4. Apple–FBI encryption dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple–FBI_encryption_dispute

    An iPhone 5C, the model used by one of the perpetrators of the 2015 San Bernardino attack. The Apple–FBI encryption dispute concerns whether and to what extent courts in the United States can compel manufacturers to assist in unlocking cell phones whose data are cryptographically protected. [1]

  5. Electronic Communications Privacy Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Communications...

    The ECPA extended privacy protections provided by the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (of employers monitoring of employees phone calls) to include also electronic and cell phone communications. [6] [7] See also Employee monitoring and Workplace privacy.

  6. City of Ontario v. Quon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Ontario_v._Quon

    The case would involve two areas of law, both coming under the Fourth Amendment. The first was the privacy rights Quon and the other officers had over text messages sent on equipment paid for by their employers. The other was their rights as public employees, since their superiors were also agents of the state.

  7. News International phone hacking scandal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_International_phone...

    A small number of victims of phone hacking engaged solicitors and made civil claims for invasion of privacy. By March 2010, News International had spent over £2 million settling court cases with victims of phone hacking. As information about these claims leaked out, The Guardian continued to follow the story. On 8 & 9 July 2009, the newspaper ...

  1. Ads

    related to: privacy case cell phone