Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Cherry picking in debates is a large problem as the facts themselves are true but need to be put in context. Because research cannot be done live and is often untimely, cherry-picked facts or quotes usually stick in the public mainstream and, even when corrected, lead to widespread misrepresentation of groups targeted.
Manufacturing controversy has been a tactic used by ideological and corporate groups to "neutralize the influence of academic scientists" in public policy debates. [4] Cherry picking of favorable data and sympathetic experts, aggrandizement of uncertainties within theoretical models, and false balance in media reporting contribute to the ...
Cherry picking is a practice of using selective facts to present to the public. It refers to the farming practice of picking only ripe cherries. Selectively presenting facts and quotes that support one's position ("cherry picking"). For example, a pharmaceutical company could choose only two trials where their product shows a positive effect ...
As a Jew and the descendent of Eastern European Jews who escaped Russian pogroms over a century ago, I’ve been devastated by events in Israel and Gaza since Oct. 7.
I am insulted that there is any suggestion of intentional deceit, unfairness and closed-door cherry picking about the funds allowed to our community.
Many people are using Bible verses to justify their stance against vaccines. David McNew/AFP via Getty ImagesA devout evangelical Christian friend of mine recently texted to explain why he was not ...
Cherry picking (suppressed evidence, incomplete evidence, argument by half-truth, fallacy of exclusion, card stacking, slanting) – using individual cases or data that confirm a particular position, while ignoring related cases or data that may contradict that position.
Likewise, some people will select only red cherries or dark purple cherries from a farm. In the context of editing an article, cherrypicking , in a negative sense, means selecting information without including contradictory or significant qualifying information from the same source and consequently misrepresenting what the source says.