Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The corporation is the legal owner of its endowment and other property. The corporation's name might consist of its governing board members' title (for example, The Trustees of Princeton University is a New Jersey nonprofit corporation). These board members (trustees, regents, etc.) are fiduciaries for the corporation. In some cases, the ...
Ohio Law § 3313.66 empowered the school principal to suspend students for 10 days or expel them. The law required students' parents to be notified of the action within 24 hours to be given the reason. If students were expelled, they could appeal to the Board of Education, but §3313.66 gave no such allowances if they were suspended.
Iowa's three public universities have redirected more than $2.1 million from diversity, equity, and inclusion roles and offices in response to a new state law and directives from the Iowa Board of ...
Knoll v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, 601 NW 2d 757 (NB Sup. 1999) Laura O. v. State, 610 NYS 2d 826 (NY App. Div. 1994) Lesser v. Board of Education of New York, 1963 239 NYS 2d 776 (NY App. Div. 1963) Levin v. Yeshiva University, 709 NYS 2d 392 (NY App. Div. 2000) Long v.
The Iowa Board of Regents is working with state universities to analyze diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and positions and ensure their compliance with a state law that will take effect ...
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth , 408 U.S. 564 (1972), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court concerning alleged discrimination against a nontenured teacher at Wisconsin State University-Oshkosh .
Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819 (1995), was an opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding whether a state university might, consistent with the First Amendment, withhold from student religious publications funding provided to similar secular student publications.
Board of Regents of University System of Georgia, 535 U.S. 613 (2002), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that a state voluntarily waives at least part of its Eleventh Amendment immunity when it invokes a federal court's removal jurisdiction. There has subsequently been a "circuit split" in federal courts ...