Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The judge and Thaler agreed in this case that Thaler himself is unable to receive the patent on behalf of DABUS. [ citation needed ] In their August 5, 2022, Thaler decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed that only a natural person could be an inventor, which means that the AI that invents any other type of invention ...
Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (PL 93-596 of January 2, 1975) [4] C. Marshall Dann: 1974: 1977 Donald W. Banner: 1978: 1979 Sidney A. Diamond: 1979: 1981 Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (Public Law 97-366 of October 25, 1982) [4] Gerald J. Mossinghoff: 1981: 1985 Donald J. Quigg: 1985: 1990 ...
Charles Holland Duell (April 13, 1850 – January 29, 1920) was the Commissioner of the United States Patent Office from 1898 to 1901, and was later an associate judge of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Thaler earlier this year lost a similar bid in the United States, where the Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's refusal to issue patents for ...
The Commissioner of Patents may refer to: Commissioner of Patents (Australia) Commissioner of Patents (Canada) Commissioner for Patents (US) who oversees the United States Patent and Trademark Office and reports to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property. List of people who have headed the United States Patent Office
Tyler v. Tuel: 10 U.S. 324: 1810: Patent Act of 1793: Assignee of geographically-limited patent right could not bring action in their own name. Evans v. Jordan: 13 U.S. 199: 1815: Patent Act of 1800, An Act for the Relief of Oliver Evans: Evans v. Eaton: 16 U.S. 454: 1818: Patent Act of 1793, An Act for the Relief of Oliver Evans: Evans v ...
Commissioner of Patents v Microcell Ltd, [4] the Commissioner alleged that NRDC's new process was merely a new use for an existing product pursuant to the precedent set in this case; G.E.C.'s Application, [5] a test for assessing whether a method or process is a manner of manufacture was formulated in this case. It was held that a method or ...
Harvard College v. Canada (Commissioner of Patents): patent of higher lifeforms (CA, 2002) Honeywell v. Sperry Rand (US, 1973) Hotchkiss v. Greenwood (US, 1850) Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v ZTE Corp. and ZTE Deutschland GmbH (European Court of Justice, C-170/13, 2015), judgement on standard-essential patents