Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The pandemic caused a number of trial delays — contributing to increased case backlogs — which are further exacerbated by the judicial vacancy crisis in New Jersey brought on by retirements ...
The Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides, "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial...". [ 1 ] The Clause protects the defendant from delay between the presentation of the indictment or similar charging instrument and the beginning of trial.
For example, in Michigan the so-called "910 Report" must be filed after a matter is under advisement for more than 90 days. It requires the judge to file a certified statement with the court administrator specifying the case, the matters taken under advisement, the reasons for the delay, and the estimated time of arrival for the cure to the ...
New Jersey’s Affidavit of Merit Statute (NJ Rev Stat § 2A:53A-27 (2013)) was signed into law in 1995. The statute states that if a person sues for injury, death, or property damage because of a professional's mistake or carelessness, they must provide a special letter from an expert within 60 days after the other side responds to their ...
The Judiciary would get about $895.5 million in the governor’s proposed budget. This is about $10 million — or 1% — less than what the state's court system received in the 2024 adjusted ...
A motion or application for leave is a motion filed with the court seeking permission to deviate from an established rule or procedure of the court. [ 1 ] The most common use of a motion for leave is to seek an extension to an already-passed time frame to amend a court pleading , which is allowed once under the Federal Rules of Criminal ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Certain pretrial delays are automatically excluded from the Act's time limits, such as delays caused by pretrial motions. [9] In Henderson v.United States, 476 U.S. 321, 330 (1986), the Supreme Court held that § 3161 excludes "all time between the filing of a motion and the conclusion of the hearing on that motion, whether or not a delay in holding that hearing is 'reasonably necessary.'"