enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Acts of the Apostles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acts_of_the_Apostles

    The name "Acts of the Apostles" was first used by Irenaeus in the late 2nd century. It is not known whether this was an existing name for the book or one invented by Irenaeus; it does seem clear that it was not given by the author, as the word práxeis (deeds, acts) only appears once in the text (Acts 19:18) and there it refers not to the apostles but to deeds confessed by their followers.

  3. Luke the Evangelist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luke_the_Evangelist

    Whether Luke was a Jew or gentile, or something in between, it is clear from the quality of the Greek language used in Luke-Acts that the author, held in Christian tradition to be Luke, was one of the most highly educated of the authors of the New Testament. The author's conscious and intentional allusions and references to, and quotations of ...

  4. Luke–Acts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luke–Acts

    Luke–Acts has sometimes been presented as a single book in published Bibles or New Testaments, for example, in The Original New Testament (1985) [4] and The Books of the Bible (2007). Luke is the longest of the four gospels and the longest book in the New Testament; together with Acts of the Apostles it makes up a two-volume work from the ...

  5. Authorship of Luke–Acts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_Luke–Acts

    The Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles make up a two-volume work which scholars call Luke–Acts. [1] The author is not named in either volume. [2] According to a Church tradition, first attested by Irenaeus (c. 130 – c. 202 AD), he was the Luke named as a companion of Paul in three of the Pauline letters, but "a critical consensus emphasizes the countless contradictions between the ...

  6. Historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_reliability_of...

    It has been claimed that the author of Acts used the writings of Josephus (specifically Antiquities of the Jews) as a historical source. [13] [14] The majority of scholars reject both this claim and the claim that Josephus borrowed from Acts, [15] [16] [17] arguing instead that Luke and Josephus drew on common traditions and historical sources.

  7. John Mark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Mark

    John Mark (Greek: Ἰωάννης Μᾶρκος, romanized: Iōannēs Markos) is named in the Acts of the Apostles as an assistant accompanying Paul and Barnabas on their missionary journeys. Traditionally he is regarded as identical with Mark the Evangelist, the traditional writer of the Gospel of Mark.

  8. Theophilus (biblical) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theophilus_(biblical)

    Theophilus (Greek: Θεόφιλος) is the name or honorary title of the person to whom the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles are addressed (Luke 1:3, Acts 1:1). It is thought that both works were written by the same author, and often argued that the two books were originally a single unified work. [1]

  9. Acts 3 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acts_3

    Acts 3 is the third chapter of the Acts of the Apostles in the New Testament of the Christian Bible. The book containing this chapter is anonymous but early Christian tradition affirmed that Luke composed this book as well as the Gospel of Luke . [ 1 ]