Ad
related to: sample briefs of court cases in pennsylvaniacourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- Public Court Records
See Public Public Court Records
Millions Of Citizens. Search Today!
- Court Case Records
Get Info On Any Public Court Case
Reveal Incriminating Details Today!
- Criminal Court Records
See If Anyone Has Been To Court
Browse Up To Date Court Records
- Court Criminal Check
Court Records, Millions Of Citizens
Available In Our Database. Search
- Public Court Records
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County C-48-CV-2020-6915 Dismissed Court denied oral motion. [35] [36] November 25, 2020: Kelly v. Pennsylvania: Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court No. 20A98 (US Supreme Ct.) 68 MAP 2020 (PA Supreme Ct.) 620 MD 2020 (PA Commonw. Ct.) Denied
Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 600 U.S. 122 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a Pennsylvania law that requires out-of-state companies to agree to appear in Pennsylvania courts as a prerequisite to registering for business in the state is consistent with Due Process.
Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, No. 17-647, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with compensation for private property owners when the use of that property is taken from them by state or local governments, under the Due Process Clause and the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The Supreme Court action marks "an important reaffirmation of the right to vote in Pennsylvania," said Ben Geffen, a lawyer who represented voters in the case. Justice Samuel Alito, one of the ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in a 4-3 decision Wednesday that state law provides voters whose mail ballots are rejected an opportunity to vote by provisional ballot. More than 1.1 million ...
J. Bart DeLone from the Pennsylvania's Attorney General's Office represented Pedro Cortés and Monna Accurti (Commissioner of the Bureau of Commissions, Legislation and Elections) at the Supreme Court. He argued that even if the Court holds political gerrymandering justiciable, a districting scheme could only be found unconstitutional if "the ...
William Penn School District et al. v. Pennsylvania Department of Education et al. was a landmark decision of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania on funding for public education by the Pennsylvania General Assembly. The Court ruled that the underfunding of rural and underprivileged school districts violated the Pennsylvania Constitution. [1]
Commonwealth v. Matos, 672 A.2d 769 (1996), is a Pennsylvania State Supreme Court case which further developed Pennsylvania Constitutional Law as affording greater privacy protections than those guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Ad
related to: sample briefs of court cases in pennsylvaniacourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month