enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Logic and rationality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_and_rationality

    As the study of argument is of clear importance to the reasons that we hold things to be true, logic is of essential importance to rationality. Arguments may be logical if they are "conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity", [1] while they are rational according to the broader requirement that they are based on reason and knowledge.

  3. Federalist No. 6 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_No._6

    Madison an empiricist argument similar to Hamilton's, though he emphasized the a priori argument from human nature rather than providing examples. [4]: 66 Both authors proposed in their respective essays that what was in the best interest of a nation was an objective truth that could be determined through reason.

  4. Argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument

    An argument is formally valid if and only if the denial of the conclusion is incompatible with accepting all the premises. In formal logic, the validity of an argument depends not on the actual truth or falsity of its premises and conclusion, but on whether the argument has a valid logical form.

  5. Logical reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_reasoning

    Logical reasoning is a form of thinking that is concerned with arriving at a conclusion in a rigorous way. [1] This happens in the form of inferences by transforming the information present in a set of premises to reach a conclusion.

  6. Argument from reason - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_reason

    The argument from reason is a transcendental argument against metaphysical naturalism and for the existence of God (or at least a supernatural being that is the source of human reason). The best-known defender of the argument is C. S. Lewis .

  7. Reason - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason

    Reason is the capacity of consciously applying logic by drawing valid conclusions from new or existing information, with the aim of seeking the truth. [1] It is associated with such characteristically human activities as philosophy, religion, science, language, mathematics, and art, and is normally considered to be a distinguishing ability possessed by humans.

  8. Federalist No. 1 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_No._1

    Many of the arguments and rhetorical approaches of Federalist No. 1 are reused throughout the series, including the use of historical examples, the explicit challenge of opponents that had concerns about a centralized government, [4]: 59 asking the reader to prioritize reason over emotion, [6]: 81 presenting legal and moral dilemmas as having ...

  9. Argument–deduction–proof distinctions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument–deduction...

    Every argument's conclusion is a premise of other arguments. The word constituent may be used for either a premise or conclusion. In the context of this article and in most classical contexts, all candidates for consideration as argument constituents fall under the category of truth-bearer: propositions, statements, sentences, judgments, etc.