Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Relevance feedback is a feature of some information retrieval systems. The idea behind relevance feedback is to take the results that are initially returned from a given query, to gather user feedback, and to use information about whether or not those results are relevant to perform a new query. We can usefully distinguish between three types ...
Machine learning based query term weight and synonym analyzer for query expansion. LucQE - open-source, Java. Provides a framework along with several implementations that allow to perform query expansion with the use of Apache Lucene. Xapian is an open-source search library which includes support for query expansion; ReQue open-source, Python ...
The Rocchio algorithm is based on a method of relevance feedback found in information retrieval systems which stemmed from the SMART Information Retrieval System developed between 1960 and 1964. Like many other retrieval systems, the Rocchio algorithm was developed using the vector space model .
For this example, that ordering would be the monotonically decreasing sort of all known relevance judgments. In addition to the six from this experiment, suppose we also know there is a document D 7 {\displaystyle D_{7}} with relevance grade 3 to the same query and a document D 8 {\displaystyle D_{8}} with relevance grade 2 to that query.
The number of relevant documents, , is used as the cutoff for calculation, and this varies from query to query. For example, if there are 15 documents relevant to "red" in a corpus (R=15), R-precision for "red" looks at the top 15 documents returned, counts the number that are relevant r {\displaystyle r} turns that into a relevancy fraction: r ...
In information retrieval, Okapi BM25 (BM is an abbreviation of best matching) is a ranking function used by search engines to estimate the relevance of documents to a given search query. It is based on the probabilistic retrieval framework developed in the 1970s and 1980s by Stephen E. Robertson , Karen Spärck Jones , and others.
A measure called "maximal marginal relevance" (MMR) has been proposed to manage this shortcoming. It considers the relevance of each document only in terms of how much new information it brings given the previous results. [13] In some cases, a query may have an ambiguous interpretation, or a variety of potential responses.
Candidate documents from the corpus can be retrieved and ranked using a variety of methods. Relevance rankings of documents in a keyword search can be calculated, using the assumptions of document similarities theory, by comparing the deviation of angles between each document vector and the original query vector where the query is represented as a vector with same dimension as the vectors that ...