enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gold Clause Cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Clause_Cases

    Separately, the federal government and the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, as creditors of the Iron Mountain Railway, intervened in a case brought by the Missouri Pacific Railroad for additional payment on Iron Mountain bonds. In both cases the district and appeal courts upheld the Gold Clause Resolution and denied additional payment.

  3. Missouri, Kansas, & Texas Railway Co. of Texas v. May

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri,_Kansas,_&_Texas...

    Missouri, Kansas, [] & Texas Railway Company of Texas v. Clay May, 194 U.S. 267 (1904), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that a Texas law did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by penalizing only railroad companies for allowing certain weeds to mature and go to seed on their land.

  4. Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases/Reports/B

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_U.S...

    Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County: 217 Georgia v. Stanton: 218 Maxwell v. Dow: 219 Crandall v. Nevada: 220 Papish v. Board of Curators of University of Missouri: 221 Smith v. Cain: 222 County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund: 223 Ex parte Milligan: 224 United States v. Price: 225 Rodriguez v.

  5. McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCabe_v._Atchison,_Topeka...

    McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, 235 U.S. 151 (1914), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that an Oklahoma law was unconstitutional insofar as it did not provide dining cars and other luxury accommodations for African-American passengers, however the Court also ruled that the litigants were not entitled to equitable relief because they lacked ...

  6. Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_ex_rel._Gaines_v...

    The State of Missouri had offered to pay for Gaines's tuition at an adjacent state's law school, which he turned down. Gaines, assisted by the NAACP , sued the all-white university in 1935. The issue was whether Missouri violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by affording white people, not Black people, the ability to ...

  7. Missouri v. Jenkins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_v._Jenkins

    Missouri v. Jenkins, 515 U.S. 70 (1995), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.On June 12, 1995 the Court, in a 5–4 decision, reversed a district court ruling that required the state of Missouri to correct intentional racial discrimination in Kansas City schools by funding salary increases and remedial education programs.

  8. Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_Lutheran_Church_of...

    Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Missouri program that denied a grant to a religious school for playground resurfacing, while providing grants to similarly situated non-religious groups, violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to ...

  9. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruzan_v._Director...

    The State of Missouri withdrew from the case in September 1990 since its law had been upheld and it had won the larger constitutional issue being considered. [9] p. 29 With the Cruzans facing no opposition, Jasper County Probate Judge Charles Teel ruled that the Cruzans had met the evidentiary burden of "clear and convincing evidence."