enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Bengal Sati Regulation, 1829 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_Sati_Regulation,_1829

    Source: [11] A regulation for declaring the practice of sati, or of burning or burying alive the widows of Hindus, illegal, and punishable by the criminal courts, passed by the governor-general in council on 4 December 1829, corresponding with the 20th Aughun 1236 Bengal era; the 23rd Aughun 1237 Fasli; the 21st Aughun 1237 Vilayati; the 8th Aughun 1886 Samavat; and the 6th Jamadi-us-Sani 1245 ...

  3. Sati (practice) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_(practice)

    Opposition to the practice of sati by evangelists like Carey, and by Hindu reformers such as Raja Ram Mohan Roy ultimately led the British Governor-General of India Lord William Bentinck to enact the Bengal Sati Regulation, 1829, declaring the practice of burning or burying alive of Hindu widows to be punishable by the criminal courts.

  4. Bhabani Charan Bandyopadhyay - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhabani_Charan_Bandyopadhyay

    It was actually the main vehicle of Ram Mohan Roy's campaign against Sati. Although Ram Mohan Roy was the owner, Sambad Kaumudi was published in the name of Bhabani Charan Bandyopadhyay. The latter soon found Ram Mohan's ideas too radical and parted company to start a rival newspaper called Samachar Chandrika , which became an organ of orthodox ...

  5. 1829 in India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1829_in_India

    Events in the year 1829 in India. Incumbents Akbar ... 4 December – Bengal Sati Regulation, 1829; References This page was last edited on 21 August 2024, at 10: ...

  6. Dharma Sabha - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dharma_sabha

    The Dharma Sabha filed an appeal in the Privy Council against the ban on Sati by Lord William Bentinck as, according to them, it went against the assurance given by George III of non-interference in Hindu religious affairs; however, their appeal was rejected and the ban on Sati was upheld in 1832.

  7. Lord William Bentinck - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_William_Bentinck

    Thus on Sunday morning of 4 December 1829 Lord Bentinck issued Regulation XVII declaring sati to be illegal and punishable in criminal courts. It was presented to William Carey for translation. His response is recorded as follows: "Springing to his feet and throwing off his black coat he cried, 'No church for me to-day...

  8. History of women in the Indian subcontinent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_women_in_the...

    This practice was initially met with local resistance, as it flew in the face of tradition. Raja Rammohan Roy's efforts led to the abolition of Sati under Governor-General William Cavendish-Bentinck in 1829. Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar's crusade for improvement in the situation of widows led to the Widow Remarriage Act of 1856.

  9. Superstition in India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstition_in_India

    Sati is the act or custom of a Hindu widow burning herself or being burned to death on the funeral pyre of her husband. [15] After watching the Sati of his own sister-in-law, Ram Mohan Roy began campaigning for abolition of the practice in 1811. The practice of Sati was abolished by Governor General Lord William Bentinck in British India in ...