Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Likewise, an appeals court may remand a case to a trial court. A remand may be a full remand, essentially ordering an entirely new trial; when an appellate court grants a full remand, the lower court's decision is "reversed and remanded." Alternatively, it may be "with instructions" specifying, for example, that the lower court must use a ...
Even if the case against them was strong, they had tried to make arguments in defense, and these arguments had been undermined by encouraging the jury to draw adverse inferences from their failure to testify—especially given how often the prosecution had referred to it. [1] Their convictions were therefore reversed, and remanded for a new ...
judgment reversed, and cause remanded Adamos v. New York Life Insurance Company: 293 U.S. 386 (1935) Hughes 9-0 none none certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (3d Cir.) judgment reversed, and cause remanded Panama Refining Company v. Ryan: 293 U.S. 388 (1934) Hughes 8-1 none Cardozo (opinion)
565 U.S. 1 Decided October 31, 2011. Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded. The Court reversed, for the third time, a judgment of the Ninth Circuit that had set aside the conviction of a woman for the death of her infant grandson attributed to shaken baby syndrome (SBS).
The first three convictions were reversed by the Mississippi Supreme Court, citing prosecutorial misconduct in all three trials, and remanded for trial again. The first conviction was reversed because of false statements made by the prosecutor to mislead the jury. The second and third convictions involved Batson violations. The fourth and fifth ...
The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the Court of Appeals with instructions to use the more appropriate comparison. Further if, on remand, the Respondents did establish a prima facie disparate-impact case, the Petitioners would then need to "produce evidence of a legitimate business justification" for the hiring practices that created ...
On 17 October 2014, the 11th Circuit reversed and remanded to the lower court for reconsideration in light of its opinion. [8] The 11th Circuit reversed the grant of attorney's fees, and closely examined the lower court's 300-plus page fair use decision in their own 129-page decision, affirming and reversing various portions of the District ...
Initially the United States Court of Federal Claims agreed with the contractors, changing the termination for default into a termination for convenience (the contractors sought US$1.2 billion in total costs under such a termination); however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the decision and remanded the case ...