enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of file systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems

    File system Hard links Symbolic links Block journaling Metadata-only journaling Case-sensitive Case-preserving File Change Log XIP Resident files (inline data)

  3. XFS - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XFS

    However, a new XFS feature implemented by Dave Chinner and called delayed logging, available since version 2.6.39 of the Linux kernel mainline, is said to resolve this; [35] performance benchmarks done by the developer in 2010 revealed performance levels to be similar to ext4 at low thread counts, and superior at high thread counts. [36]

  4. Comparison of disk cloning software - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_disk_cloning...

    Disk Cloning Software Disk cloning capabilities of various software. Name Operating system User Interface Cloning features Operation model License

  5. Bcachefs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bcachefs

    He intended it to be an advanced file system with modern features [16] like those of ZFS or Btrfs, with the speed and performance of file systems such as ext4 and XFS. [3] As of 2017 Overstreet was receiving financial support for the development of Bcachefs via Patreon. [5] As of mid-2018, the on-disk format had settled. [8]

  6. Comparison of Linux distributions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux...

    The table below shows the default file system, but many Linux distributions support some or all of ext2, ext3, ext4, Btrfs, ReiserFS, Reiser4, JFS, XFS, GFS2, OCFS2, and NILFS. It is possible to install Linux onto most of these file systems.

  7. ext4 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4

    ext4 (fourth extended filesystem) is a journaling file system for Linux, developed as the successor to ext3.. ext4 was initially a series of backward-compatible extensions to ext3, many of them originally developed by Cluster File Systems for the Lustre file system between 2003 and 2006, meant to extend storage limits and add other performance improvements. [4]

  8. Comparison of distributed file systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_distributed...

    Some researchers have made a functional and experimental analysis of several distributed file systems including HDFS, Ceph, Gluster, Lustre and old (1.6.x) version of MooseFS, although this document is from 2013 and a lot of information are outdated (e.g. MooseFS had no HA for Metadata Server at that time).

  9. Comparison of operating system kernels - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_operating...

    ext4 F2FS FAT FreeVxFS HFS HFS+ HPFS ISO 9660 JFFS JFFS2 JFS MINIX fs NSS NTFS OCFS QNX4 FS System V FS UDF UFS XFS ZFS ReiserFS Reiser4 Btrfs HAMMER Tux3 exFAT ReFS; DragonFly BSD kernel: No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No limited write No No No read only Yes No No No No No Yes No No No FreeBSD kernel: No No ...