Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
§252(c) working time is defined to be time that is compensable under (a) contract, collective agreement or custom or (b) when it was compensable. §254, limits employer liability for time spent in "preliminary and postliminary" activity.
The employer, Jewell Ridge, sought declaratory judgment against its employee's union to determine whether the time spent traveling underground by the coal miners between the portals of the employer's two bituminous coal mines and the working faces was included in the compensable workweek under § 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 207(a).
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez , 546 U.S. 21 (2005), is a US labor law case of the a United States Supreme Court , interpreting the Federal Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938, as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947.
An Indian company says an email informing staff that admitted to burnout had been fired was in reality part of an elaborate ruse to raise awareness over workplace stress.
SPOILER ALERT: This article contains major plot details from the finale of Edward Berger’s “Conclave.” Megyn Kelly took to X to criticize Edward Berger’s “Conclave” as a “disgusting ...
Fair Labor Standards Act Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk , 574 U.S. 27 (2014), was a unanimous decision by the United States Supreme Court , ruling that time spent by workers waiting to undergo anti-employee theft security screenings is not "integral and indispensable" to their work, and thus not compensable under the Fair Labor ...
Where to shop today's best deals: Kate Spade, Amazon, Walmart and more
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946), is a decision by the US Supreme Court that held that preliminary work activities, if controlled by the employer and performed entirely for the employer's benefit, are properly included as working time under Fair Labor Standards Act. [1] The decision is known as the "portal to portal case."