Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A known example is the Sacha Baron Cohen article, where false information added in Wikipedia was apparently used by two newspapers, leading to it being treated as reliable in Wikipedia. [ 124 ] [ better source needed ] This process of creating reliable sources for false facts has been termed "citogenesis" by xkcd webcomic artist Randall Munroe .
Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources, i.e., a document or recording that relates to or discusses information originally presented elsewhere. Reputable tertiary sources , such as introductory-level university textbooks, almanacs, and encyclopedias, may be cited.
Wikipedia pages often cite reliable secondary sources that vet data from primary sources. If the information on another Wikipedia page (which you want to cite as the source) has a primary or secondary source, you ought be able to cite that primary or secondary source and eliminate the middleman (or "middle-page" in this case).
There are many examples of court cases that used Wikipedia to determine their outcome. For example, “a Wikipedia article on profanity was cited in a motion to dismiss a case in a Colorado court” [9]. Courts are starting to turn to Wikipedia as a source of reliable information despite anonymous authors.
Even when information is cited to reliable sources, you must present it with a neutral point of view (NPOV). Articles should be based on thorough research of sources. All articles must adhere to NPOV, fairly representing all majority and significant-minority viewpoints published by reliable sources, in rough proportion to the prominence of each ...
Wikipedia articles can have poor quality in many ways including self-contradictions. [2] Those poor articles require improvement. Large platforms including YouTube [3] and Facebook [4] use Wikipedia's content to confirm the accuracy of the information in their own media collections.
In Wikipedia, verifiability means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that information comes from a reliable source. No original research ( WP:NOR ) – Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source .
Articles related to popular culture and fiction must be backed up by reliable sources like all other articles. However, due to the subject matter, many may not be discussed in the same academic contexts as science, law, philosophy and so on; it is common that plot analysis and criticism, for instance, may only be found in what would otherwise ...