Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: Full case name: Kevin Khoa Nguyen, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barnes & Noble Inc., Defendant-Appellant : Argued: May 16 2014: Decided: Aug 18 2014: Citation: 763 F.3d 1171 [1] Holding
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judgeship and Reorganization Act of 2017, H.R. 196 [24] The more recent proposals have aimed to redefine the Ninth Circuit to cover California, Hawaii, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands, and to create a new Twelfth Circuit to cover Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.
United States District Court for the District of Nevada; Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. Arakaki v. State of Hawai'i; Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc. Arizona v. Navajo Nation; Aronow v. United States; Asset Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Gagnon; Association of Christian Schools International v. Stearns
The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), a plaintiff in the California case, welcomed the parts of the 9th Circuit's ruling that rejected the state's defense of certain location-specific gun restrictions.
United States v. Arnold, 533 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2008), is a United States court case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not require government agents to have reasonable suspicion before searching laptops or other digital devices at the border, including international airports.
Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow (2004). The Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion, reversed a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision that the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance violated the First Amendment due to a lack of standing. [13] Williams v. Vidmar (2004).
The Supreme Court was asked to review the Ninth' Circuit's decision upholding Alaska's restrictions on campaign finance after the Cato Institute petitioned to the Supreme Court to reverse the Ninth Circuit. [1] Alaska's limit on campaign contributions was $500 per year to an individual candidate and $1,000 per year to a political group. [2] [3]
In both cases the only school resource used was a freely available photo of the principal posted on the district's website. In both cases the circuit found no distinction from Thomas or Porter and held that the use of the principal's photo was not enough of a nexus with school activity to put the profiles under school authority. [22]