enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Euclid's theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid's_theorem

    Euclid offered a proof published in his work Elements (Book IX, Proposition 20), [1] which is paraphrased here. [2] Consider any finite list of prime numbers p 1, p 2, ..., p n. It will be shown that there exists at least one additional prime number not included in this list. Let P be the product of all the prime numbers in the list: P = p 1 p ...

  3. Furstenberg's proof of the infinitude of primes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furstenberg's_proof_of_the...

    In mathematics, particularly in number theory, Hillel Furstenberg's proof of the infinitude of primes is a topological proof that the integers contain infinitely many prime numbers. When examined closely, the proof is less a statement about topology than a statement about certain properties of arithmetic sequences.

  4. Euclid number - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid_number

    Not all Euclid numbers are prime. E 6 = 13# + 1 = 30031 = 59 × 509 is the first composite Euclid number.. Every Euclid number is congruent to 3 modulo 4 since the primorial of which it is composed is twice the product of only odd primes and thus congruent to 2 modulo 4.

  5. Arithmetic progression topologies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_progression...

    Both the Furstenberg and Golomb topologies furnish a proof that there are infinitely many prime numbers. [1] [2] A sketch of the proof runs as follows: Fix a prime p and note that the (positive, in the Golomb space case) integers are a union of finitely many residue classes modulo p. Each residue class is an arithmetic progression, and thus clopen.

  6. Fermat number - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_number

    If 2 k + 1 is prime and k > 0, then k itself must be a power of 2, [1] so 2 k + 1 is a Fermat number; such primes are called Fermat primes. As of 2023 [update] , the only known Fermat primes are F 0 = 3 , F 1 = 5 , F 2 = 17 , F 3 = 257 , and F 4 = 65537 (sequence A019434 in the OEIS ).

  7. Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet's_theorem_on...

    Although the proof of Dirichlet's Theorem makes use of calculus and analytic number theory, some proofs of examples are much more straightforward. In particular, the proof of the example of infinitely many primes of the form + makes an argument similar to the one made in the proof of Euclid's theorem (Silverman 2013). The proof is given below:

  8. Regular prime - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_prime

    To prove the Fermat's Last Theorem for a strong irregular prime p is more difficult (since Kummer proved the first case of Fermat's Last Theorem for B-regular primes, Vandiver proved the first case of Fermat's Last Theorem for E-regular primes), the most difficult is that p is not only a strong irregular prime, but 2p + 1, 4p + 1, 8p + 1, 10p ...

  9. List of prime numbers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prime_numbers

    A cluster prime is a prime p such that every even natural number k ≤ p − 3 is the difference of two primes not exceeding p. 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, ... (OEIS: A038134) All odd primes between 3 and 89, inclusive, are cluster primes. The first 10 primes that are not cluster primes are: 2, 97, 127, 149, 191, 211, 223, 227, 229, 251.