enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Johnson v. McIntosh - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_v._McIntosh

    McIntosh, [a] 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823), also written M‘Intosh, is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that held that private citizens could not purchase lands from Native Americans. As the facts were recited by Chief Justice John Marshall , the successor in interest to a private purchase from the Piankeshaw attempted to ...

  3. Oleksandr Usyk vs. Tony Bellew - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleksandr_Usyk_vs._Tony_Bellew

    A week after signing with Matchroom, the Usyk vs. Bellew fight was announced to take place on 10 November at the Manchester Arena. [14] [15] Bellew's guaranteed purse for the fight was £4 million. [16] Speaking in the build up to the bout Bellew said "I feel fantastic. Fat boy is in shape. Usyk is in the deep end. There will be war.

  4. In the Courts of the Conqueror - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Courts_of_the_Conqueror

    The book draws from both well-known decisions of federal courts as well as less well known cases in explaining the doctrines of federal Indian law. The case of Johnson v. McIntosh by the Supreme Court in 1823 is well known to most law students as declaring that Indian tribes had the right to occupy the land but only the United States held title ...

  5. McIntosh v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McIntosh_v._United_States

    McIntosh v. United States , 601 U.S. 330 (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a court's failure to enter a preliminary order imposing criminal forfeiture before sentencing does not necessarily bar a judge from ordering forfeiture at sentencing.

  6. Tony Bellew confirms clash at Paul v Tyson press conference ...

    www.aol.com/news/tony-bellew-crashes-tyson-vs...

    The former world champion, standing in the crowd, interrupted a journalist in an apparent bid to mock Paul

  7. Discovery doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_doctrine

    The discovery doctrine was expounded by the United States Supreme Court in a series of decisions, most notably Johnson v. McIntosh in 1823. In that case, Chief Justice John Marshall held that under generally accepted principles of international law:

  8. Fortex Group Ltd (in Receivership and Liquidation) v MacIntosh

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortex_Group_Ltd_(in...

    Fortex Group Ltd (in Receivership and Liquidation) v MacIntosh; Court: Court of Appeal of New Zealand: Full case name: Fortex Group Ltd (in Receivership and Liquidation) v MacIntosh : Decided: 30 March 1998: Citation [1998] 3 NZLR 171: Court membership; Judges sitting: Gault, Henry J, Keith, Blanchard J, Tipping

  9. Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases/Reports/B

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_U.S...

    Worcester v. Georgia: 494 McIntosh v. United States: 495 Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A. 496 United States v. Hudson: 497 In re Kansas Indians: 498 Lakeside v. Oregon: 499 Times Film Corporation v. City of Chicago: 500 Clay v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd. 501 Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt