Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[8]: 1 The case was scheduled to be heard over a number of trials at the Rolls Building in London. [ 4 ] The claimants were represented in court by a team from Henderson Chambers led by Patrick Green KC, instructed by Freeths, while the Post Office lead barristers included David Cavender KC and Anthony de Garr Robinson KC, both from One Essex ...
Royal Mail was selling some of its branches to private companies under a franchising arrangement. Royal Mail thought that no automatic transfer took place under TUPER 2006 regulation 4 when workers went to the franchisee. It therefore refused to offer this option to the employees (on top of what it was doing to relocate staff under mobility ...
The government later announced that it would provide further compensation to the litigants through the GLO compensation scheme. [9] Following the settlement, Bates crowdfunded £98,000 to obtain legal advice to submit a claim to the Parliamentary Ombudsman , asking the government to reimburse the legal costs of the group litigants and provide ...
Historically, Royal Mail and the Post Office were part of the same entity and were a public authority. They split into separate organisations in 2012. [ 11 ] The Post Office's unique position, with a history as a prosecutor going back to 1683, gave the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) concerns about its neutrality.
Royal Mail has, in some quarters, a poor reputation for losing mail despite its claims that more than 99.93% of mail arrives safely and in 2006 was fined £11.7 million due to the amount of mail lost, stolen or damaged. [133]
Get answers to your AOL Mail, login, Desktop Gold, AOL app, password and subscription questions. Find the support options to contact customer care by email, chat, or phone number.
On 12 October, Royal Mail challenged the legality of the next phase of the planned action, claiming that the notice of the strike had been improperly issued. [10] 24 hour strikes were planned for; [11] Monday 15 October from 6pm at Mail sorting offices and airports; Tuesday 16 October from 3am at Deliveries and collection hubs
Efobi v Royal Mail [2021] UKSC 33 is a judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. The case was heard by Lord Hodge , Lord Briggs , Lady Arden , Lord Hamblen , and Lord Leggatt on 27 April 2021. [ 1 ]