Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
(In reverse, this also means that for .NET framework ref classes, reference operator overloading often is implicitly implemented in C++/CLI.) For example, comparing two distinct String references (String^) via the operator == will give true whenever the two strings are equal. The operator overloading is static, however.
For function that manipulate strings, modern object-oriented languages, like C# and Java have immutable strings and return a copy (in newly allocated dynamic memory), while others, like C manipulate the original string unless the programmer copies data to a new string.
For example, two string objects may be distinct objects (unequal in the first sense) but contain the same sequence of characters (equal in the second sense). See identity for more of this issue. Real numbers, including many simple fractions , cannot be represented exactly in floating-point arithmetic , and it may be necessary to test for ...
Other languages use different symbols for the two operators. [22] For example: In ALGOL and Pascal, the assignment operator is a colon and an equals sign (":=") while the equality operator is a single equals ("="). In C, the assignment operator is a single equals sign ("=") while the equality operator is a pair of equals signs ("==").
Most of the operators available in C and C++ are also available in other C-family languages such as C#, D, Java, Perl, and PHP with the same precedence, associativity, and semantics. Many operators specified by a sequence of symbols are commonly referred to by a name that consists of the name of each symbol.
The cast operator is not overloadable, but one can write a conversion operator method which lives in the target class. Conversion methods can define two varieties of operators, implicit and explicit conversion operators. The implicit operator will cast without specifying with the cast operator (()) and the explicit operator requires it to be used.
In computer science, type safety and type soundness are the extent to which a programming language discourages or prevents type errors.Type safety is sometimes alternatively considered to be a property of facilities of a computer language; that is, some facilities are type-safe and their usage will not result in type errors, while other facilities in the same language may be type-unsafe and a ...
The #ifeq function selects one of two alternatives based on whether two test strings are equal to each other. {{#ifeq: string 1 | string 2 | value if equal | value if not equal}} If both strings are valid numerical values, they are compared as numbers, rather than as literal strings: {{#ifeq: 01 | 1 | equal | not equal }} → equal