Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Printable version; In other projects ... investment ratio (PIR) and value ... 5 6000 0.621 3726 Total present value 43679 (-) Investment 40000 NPV 3679 PI = 43679/ ...
The choice of how GDP is calculated (e.g. deflator), can materially affect the absolute value of the ratio; [18] for example, the Buffett indicator calculated by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis peaks at 118% in Q1 2000, [21] while the version calculated by Wilshire Associates peaks at 137% in Q1 2000, [22] while the versions following ...
In corporate finance, [1] [2] [3] the present value of growth opportunities (PVGO) is a valuation measure applied to growth stocks. It represents the component of the company's stock value that corresponds to (expected) growth in earnings .
The total-debt-to-total-assets ratio is one of many financial metrics used to measure a company’s performance. In this case, the ratio shows how much of a company’s operations are funded by debt.
A PEG Ratio can also be a negative number if a stock's present income figure is negative (negative earnings), or if future earnings are expected to drop (negative growth). PEG ratios calculated from negative present earnings are viewed with skepticism as almost meaningless, other than as an indication of high investment risk. [6]
In finance, the equivalent annual cost (EAC) is the cost per year of owning and operating an asset over its entire lifespan.It is calculated by dividing the negative NPV of a project by the "present value of annuity factor":
Enterprise value/EBITDA (more commonly referred to by the acronym EV/EBITDA) is a popular valuation multiple used to determine the fair market value of a company. By contrast to the more widely available P/E ratio (price-earnings ratio) it includes debt as part of the value of the company in the numerator and excludes costs such as the need to replace depreciating plant, interest on debt, and ...
Tobin's q [a] (or the q ratio, and Kaldor's v), is the ratio between a physical asset's market value and its replacement value. It was first introduced by Nicholas Kaldor in 1966 in his paper: Marginal Productivity and the Macro-Economic Theories of Distribution: Comment on Samuelson and Modigliani .