Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 2004, in Crawford v.Washington, the Supreme Court of the United States significantly redefined the application of the Sixth Amendment's right to confrontation. In Crawford, the Supreme Court changed the inquiry from whether the evidence offered had an "indicia of reliability" to whether the evidence is testimonial hearsay. [3]
This right is essential to a fair trial; The Fourteenth Amendment makes this right obligatory on the States; The introduction of the transcript was a clear denial of the right of confrontation and the statement was made without an adequate opportunity for cross-examination.
Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that reformulated the standard for determining when the admission of hearsay statements in criminal cases is permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment.
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009), [1] is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that it was a violation of the Sixth Amendment right of confrontation for a prosecutor to submit a chemical drug test report without the testimony of the person who performed the test. [2]
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 6 December 2024. 1791 amendment enumerating rights related to criminal prosecutions This article is part of a series on the Constitution of the United States Preamble and Articles Preamble I II III IV V VI VII Amendments to the Constitution I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XV XVI XVII XVIII ...
Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the Sixth Amendment.The Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause, which provides criminal defendants with the right to confront witnesses against them, did not bar the use of one-way closed-circuit television to present testimony by an alleged child sex abuse victim.
Individual rights; Freedom of religion; Freedom of speech; Freedom of the press; Freedom of assembly; Right to petition; Freedom of association; Right to keep and bear arms; Right to trial by jury; Criminal procedural rights; Right to privacy; Freedom from slavery; Due process; Equal protection; Citizenship; Voting rights; Right to candidacy ...
In the opinion, the Court drew on the historical examination of the confrontation right that was seen in past cases, such as Crawford v. Washington , which stated that “the principal evil at which the Confrontation Clause was directed was the civil-law mode of criminal procedure,” which allowed the “use of ex parte examinations as ...